Analysis of Linear Surfaces of Building Structures

Purpose of reseach is to analyze the practice in the application of surfaces formed by the movement of a straight line. It is known that among the second-order surfaces cones, cylinders, hyperboloids of one sheet and hyperbolic paraboloids, as well as lines represented in the polar coordinate system in the form of intricate shapes that can be represented in space by the above-mentioned surfaces, adding a third dimension, have rectilinear generators. The strength resulting from covering each point of the listed surfaces with straight lines from different families does not make the structure heavier but strengthens it and makes it light compared to monoliths without reinforcements made of other materials, in which stability is not based on Shukhov calculation formulas.
Methods Finding families of rectilinear generators for second-order surfaces calculation of which is based on the separation of equations that represent a second-order surface as a difference of squares in one part of the equation and as a product with an arbitrary parameter in the other part.
Results. Analyzing second-order surfaces, we came to the conclusion that cones, cylinders are prone to this method of Shukhov calculations; equation of the form F (x,y)=0 in space defines a cylindrical surface whose generators are parallel to axis oz. Similarly, F (x, z)=0 defines a cylindrical surface with generators parallel to axis oy and F (y;z)=0 is a cylindrical surface with generators parallel to axis ox. A hyperboloid of one sheet, hyperbolic paraboloid, i.e. 10 surfaces out of 14, make up more than 70%.
Conclusion. As a result of applying these formulas for calculating reinforced building structures, city buildings will acquire a new appearance, which will create a comfortable environment for residents, as well as lead to saving construction material resources.

1. Bredikhin V. V., Shleenko A.V., Bredikhina N. V. Razvitie proizvodstvennotekhnicheskogo potentsiala stroitel'noi otrasli [Development of technological capacity of construction branch]. Kursk, 2016. 114 p. (In Russ.).

2. Voskoglou М. A note on the graphical representation of the derivatives. Physical and Mathematical Education: scientific journal, 2017, is. 2(12), pp.9-16.

3. Pramod Kumar Pandey. A numerical technique for the solution of general eighth order boundary value problems: a finite difference method. Ural mathematical journal, 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56-62.

4. Shleenko A.V., Volkova S.N., Pashkova M.I. Ispol'zovanie otkhodov gornodobyvayushchego regiona KMA dlya izgotovleniya novykh stroitel'nykh materialov [Use of waste of the mining region of KMA for production of new construction materials]. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Tekhnika i tekhnologii = Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Engineering and Technologies, 2015, no. 3 (16), pp. 111-114 (In Russ.).

5. Shleenko A.V., Volkova S.N., Sivak E.E. Optimizatsiya vyborki dlya postanovki nauchnogo eksperimenta tekhnologicheskogo protsessa stroitel'stva [Optimization of selection for statement of a scientific experiment of technological process of construction]. BST: Byulleten' stroitel'noi tekhniki = BST: Bulletin of the Construction Equipment, 2018, no. 11 (1011), pp. 46-48 (In Russ.).

6. Pandey P.K. Fourth Order Finite Difference Method for Sixth Order Boundary Value Problems. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2013, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 57-62. https: doi: 10.1134/S0965542513010107

7. Viswanadham K.N.S.K., Ballem S. Numerical solution of eighth order boundary value problems by Galerkin method with quintic B-splines. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2014, vol. 89, no. 15, pp. 7-13. DOI: 10.5120/15705-4562

8. Shleenko A.V., Volkova S.N. Analiz innovatsionnoi deyatel'nosti stroitel'noi organizatsii [Analysis of innovative activity of the construction organization]. Izvestiya Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo technicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of the Kursk State Technical University, 2011, no. 5-2(38), pp. 363-367 (In Russ.).

9. Reddy S.M. Numerical solution of eighth order boundary value problems by PetrovGalerkin method with quintic B-splines as basic functions and septic B-splines as weight functions. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 2016, vol. 5, no. 09, pp. 17894-1790. Available at: http://ijecs.in/index.php/ijecs/article/view/2439/2254

10. Jiang Z. W. A meshfree method for numerical solution of nonhomogeneous time dependent problems, Abstract Appl. Anal., Article ID 978310, 2014.

11. Voloshinov D.V. Constructive geometric modeling. Theory, practice, automation. Saarbrucken, Lambert Academic Publishing, 2010. 355 p.

12. Vabishchevich P. N., Vasil’ev V. I., Vasil’eva M. V. Computational identification of the right hand side of a parabolic equation. Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 2015, 55, no. 9, pp. 1015-1021.

13. Kenneth S. Schmitz Chapter 1: Philosophy of Science. Physical Chemistry, 2018, pp.183-367.

14. Philip L. Marston Geometrical and Catastrophe Optics Methods in Scattering. Physical Acoustics, 1992, vol. 21, pp. 1-234.

15. Kenneth S. Schmitz Chapter 1: Philosophy of Science. Physical Chemistry, 2018, pp.183-367.