Fuzzy System for Assessment and Mannagement of Attractiveness of Technical or Economic Objects (Case Study of the Selection of a Resource Supplier)
https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1560-2019-23-1-95-106
Abstract
Purpose of reseach is to improve the operation of technical systems or performance of socio-economic systems by developing a fuzzy system for selecting a supplier of inventories in logistics companies. The relevance of the study is determined by the absence of a system approach to the formation of a procurement logistics strategy in the overwhelming majority of companies, which makes the operations management of the analysis and evaluation process difficult. When making decisions concerning selecting a supplier, based on the analysis of a variety of sources, various mathematical methods and techniques are used; nevertheless these methods and techniques have a number of drawbacks that do not allow a company to solve the set task with the required effectiveness.
Methods. Since the original methods in solving the task of assessing and managing the attractiveness of an object are incomplete and noе clear, the method applied is based on the systems of fuzzy logic inference. The basis of the proposed method is a scheme of the direct fuzzy inference. It is modified by introducing an ordered weighted averaging operator to aggregate the outputs of the production rules. At the first stage of the derivation, the membership functions defined for the input variables are applied to their actual values for the subsequent determination of the degree of truth for each premise of each rule. Then, the calculated truth value for the premises of each rule is applied to the inferences of each rule. This leads to the formation of a fuzzy subset, which is assigned to each output variable for each rule. As a rule of logic inference, we use min operation. At the next stage, the fuzzy value of the membership function of the output variable of each rule is reduced to a crisp type by applying the fast centroid method. To aggregate the output of each production rule, taking into account the degree of their importance for the decision-maker, it is proposed to use the Ronald R. Yager’s ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator.
Results. Ordered weighted averaging and the subsequent ranking of the pairs of alternative firms made it possible to create a list of supplying companies corresponding to the objective ranking.
Conclusion. A model verification of the ranking of suppliers of packaging materials for the firms of finished products was performed. The results of an experimental study demonstrate the prospects of the proposed approach taking into account the mutual influence of the indicators.About the Authors
A. S. SizovRussian Federation
Aleksandr S. Sizov, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Professor
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya str., Kursk, 305040
V. P. Dobritsa
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav P. Dobritsa, Doctor of Phisico-Mathematical Sciences, Professor
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya str., Kursk, 305040
O. G. Dobroserdov
Russian Federation
Oleg G. Dobroserdov, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Professor, Senior Researcher
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya str., Kursk, 305040
O. I. Atakishchev
Russian Federation
Oleg I. Atakishchev, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, professor
10, Letnikovskaya str., Moscow
A. E. Zernushkin
Russian Federation
Aleksey E. Zernushkin, Adjunct
23, Blinova str., Курск, 305004
Yu. A. Khalin
Russian Federation
Yuriy A. Khalin, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya str., Kursk, 305040
R. S. Sylchenko
Russian Federation
Roman S. Sylchenko, Post-Graduate Student
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya str., Kursk, 305040
References
1. Burkovskij V.L., Shijanov B.A., Grivachev A.V., Sizov A.S., Titenko E.A. Kombinirovannyj metod analiza i vybora slozhnyh tehnicheskih ili social'no-jekonomicheskih ob#ektov. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, 2018, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 15-20.
2. Varganov A.V., Golovin A.A., Grivachev A.V., Sazonov S.Ju., Sizov A.S., Titenko E.A. Sposob ocenki vklada obshhih i individual'nyh pokazatelej dlja upravlenija tehnicheskimi i social'no-jekonomicheskimi sistemami. Informacionnye sistemy i tehnologii, 2018, no. 4 (108), pp. 24-31.
3. Brodeckij G.L. Sistemnyj analiz v logistike. Vybor v uslovijah neoprede-lennosti. Moscow, 2010, 314 p.
4. Zjornushkin A.E., Sizov A.S., Ispol'zovanie sistem nechetkogo logicheskogo vyvoda i OWA operatora Jagera dlja ocenki sostojanija slozhnyh organizacionno-tehnicheskih sistem. Infor-macionno-izmeritel'nye i upravljajushhie sistemy, 2016,. vol.14, no.6, pp. 21-28.
5. Imamverdiev Ja.N. Metod ob#edinenija rezul'tatov ansamblja klassifikatorov v mul'tibi-ometricheskih sistemah. Informacionnye tehnologii, 2011, no.9, pp. 24-31.
6. Halin Ju.A., Sizov A.S., Ignatenko A.N. Podhod k opredeleniju traektorij razvitija predpri-jatij pri upravlenii konkurentosposobnost'ju. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo uni-versiteta, 2012, no. 1-1 (40), pp. 86-92.
7. Halin Ju.A., Kiseljova K.A., Al'kov V.V. Model' informacionnogo vzaimo-dejstvija konkurirujushhih predprijatij. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Up-ravlenie, vychislitel'naja tehnika, informatika. Medicinskoe priborostroenie, 2017, vol. 7. no. 3 (24), pp. 29-35.
8. Halin Ju.A., Sizov A.S., Ignatenko A.N. Nechjotko-mnozhestvennaja model' mnogokriteri-al'noj ocenki konkurentosposobnosti predprijatija. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, № 5 (38), pp. 53-57.
9. Pisareva N.K. Razrabotka sistemy vybora postavshhika. Jekonomika i upravlenie: prob-lemy, tendencii, perspektivy razvitija. Materialy VI Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Cheboksary, 2017, pp. 200-213.
10. Grivachev A.V., Emel'janov S.G., Sazonov S.Ju., Titenko E.A. Modificirovannyj metod analiza ierarhij dlja ocenki jeffektivnosti robototehnicheskih kompleksov. Informacionno-izmeritel'nye i upravljajushhie sistemy, 2016, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 14-18.
11. Yager R.R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decisions making. IEEE Transactoins on Systems, Man Cybernetics, 1988, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183-190.
12. Shvecov Ja.A., Averchenkov V.I., Rytov M.Ju., Fjodorov V.P., Fedjaeva G.A. Intel-lektual'naja obrabotka dannyh v zadache sistematizacii jekonomiko-statisticheskoj informacii. Vestnik Brjanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, 2017, no.8, pp. 67-74.
13. Averchenkov V.I., Lagerev A.V., Podvesovskij A.G. Predstavlenie i obrabotka nechjotkoj informacii v mnogokriterial'nyh modeljah prinjatija reshenij dlja zadach upravlenija social'nymi i jekonomicheskimi sistemami. Vestnik Brjanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universi-teta, 2012, no. 2, pp. 97-104.
Review
For citations:
Sizov A.S., Dobritsa V.P., Dobroserdov O.G., Atakishchev O.I., Zernushkin A.E., Khalin Yu.A., Sylchenko R.S. Fuzzy System for Assessment and Mannagement of Attractiveness of Technical or Economic Objects (Case Study of the Selection of a Resource Supplier). Proceedings of the Southwest State University. 2019;23(1):95-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1560-2019-23-1-95-106