LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF RULE VIOLATION IN AUCTIONS AND PUBLIC COMPETITIONS: CIVIL ASPECT

In this article the author analyzes legal consequences of rule violation in auctions and public competitions in the Russian Federation. The author describes essential features for scientific justification and further improvement. Theorists’ views about specified problems are significantly different among practicing lawyers and theorists. Nevertheless the author describes independent analysis of some relevant aspects of legal consequences of rule violation in auctions and public competitions. These procedures are actively applied to ensuring state and municipal needs, thanks to bigger transparency of purchases and check convenience by control bodies. Besides public and municipal sector auction is actively held also in commercial area. Auctions represent one of ways of contract signing which is closely connected with fundamental laws of free market and expresses them more consistently. In particular it is shown in competition inherent in auctions. Such competition can cover all the areas. Use of auctions in business is caused by their convenience as the customer doesn’t search contractors. And customers also have an opportunity to make bargain with the supplier who is in other point of the country without leaving own office. It is possible to do thanks to specialized electronic resources and also by means of the digital signature allowing concluding full contracts in a digital form. Auction is dominating in commercial area and in government procurement. This procedure is the best way to promote increase in competition, offering an opportunity to reduce or raise price in real time

аукцион, конкурс, государственный, муниципальный, заказ, торги, антимоно-польный, договор, auction, competition, state, municipal, order, auction, antimonopoly, contract

1. Беляева О.А. Аукционы и конкурсы. Комментарий судебно-арбитражной практики. М.: Волтерс Клувер, 2010. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http:// base/garant.ru/5872185.

2. Беляева О.А. Правовые проблемы аукционов и конкурсов: монография. М.: Юриспруденция, 2011. С. 154.

3. Морозов А., Морозова М. Продление срока действия государственного (муниципального) контракта: невозможная возможность // Ваш партнер-кон-сультант. 2014. № 26. С. 5-7.

4. Белов В.А. Практика применения Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации, частей второй и третьей. М.: Юрайт, 2011. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http:// base/garant.ru/59698058.

5. Правовая охрана результатов интеллектуальной деятельности, созданных в ходе выполнения государственного заказа / С.Ф. Савенков, Е.Г. Храмцова, Г.Б. Басов, А.В. Красников // Известия Юго-Западного государственного университета. Серия: История и право. 2016. №4. С.78.