PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S SUPERVISION OVER PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES FOR CRIME HARM COMPENSATION

This article is devoted to entity reviewing and main directions of public prosecutor's supervision over activities of preliminary investigation officials for harm compensation caused by a crime during pre-judicial criminal cases. According to the author of this article one of the directions to support rights and legitimate people interests is to give property and physical harm compensation, moral harm compensation and business reputation compensation. This direction of preliminary investigation department activities is at least important than involvement of guilty persons to criminal responsibility for the purpose of recompense assignment. Role of an investigative authority chief, chief of inquiry subdivision, investigator, interrogator and employees of inquiry department in implementation of current legislation provisions regulating harm compensation, caused by a crime during pre-judicial criminal cases is described. The author shows examples of criminal cases which were sent by the prosecutor to additional investigation according to i.2 p.1 of Art. 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. These cases were sent to additional investigation because of inadequate work of above-stated participants of criminal legal proceedings on ensuring harm compensation caused by penal act. The author describes some reasons which have negative impact on public prosecutor's supervision over criminal legal proceeding activities of participants for ensuring harm compensation caused by a crime. Conclusion shows that now public prosecutor's supervision over preliminary investigation activities is up to date. It has a great demand for creation of legal guarantees. These guarantees are very important for those who are the victims of criminal actions and they have all the rights for full-fledged harm compensation. Public prosecutor's supervision is an important feature for procedural prosecutors. It is directed to violation prevention in activities of preliminary investigation and inquiry departments for harm compensation caused by penal acts.

прокурорский надзор, вред, причиненный преступлением, потерпевший, граждан-ский истец, органы предварительного расследования, следователь, дознаватель, public prosecutor's supervision, crime harm, victim, civil claimant, preliminary investigation departments, investigator, interrogator

1. История законодательства СССР и РСФСР по уголовному процессу и организации суда и прокуратуры: сборник документов / под ред. С.А. Галунского. - М., 1955. - 635 с.

2. Мельников В.Ю. Обеспечение и защита прав человека при применении мер процессуального принуждения в досудебном производстве Российской Федерации: дис.. д-ра юрид. наук. - М., 2014. - 552 с.

3. Петрухин И.Л. Исторический очерк деятельности прокуратуры // Отечественные записки. - 2003. - № 2 (11). - С. 389-402.

4. Предварительное следствие: учебник для курсантов и слушателей образовательных учреждений высшего профессионального образования МВД России по специальности «Юриспруденция» / под ред. М.В. Мешкова. - 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. - М.: ЮНИТИ-ДАНА: Закон и право, 2012. - 783 с.

5. Савицкий В.М. Действия прокурора при решении вопроса о направлении дел в суд // Законность. - 1958. - № 8. - С. 78-83.

6. Синенко С.А. Обеспечение прав и законных интересов потерпевшего в уголовном судопроизводстве: теоретические, законодательные и правоприменительные проблемы: дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. - М., 2014. - 418 с.

7. Титова В.Н. Применение законодательства о возмещении вреда, причинённого преступлением // Вестник академии Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации. - 2013. - № 6 (38). - С. 36-41.